Israel’s Miracle After 76 Years: Sovereignty, Conflict, and the Projection of a Global Promise
Cayey, Puerto Rico – May 14, 2025
May 14 marks one of the most defining dates of the 20th century in geopolitical terms. Seventy-six years after the creation of the State of Israel, Dr. José Benjamín Pérez Matos offers a reading that goes beyond the traditional frameworks of international analysis, positioning the Hebrew nation not only as a central actor in the global system, but as the axis of a process of historical and transcendent scope.
From Cayey, the leader revisited the books developed by Dr. William Soto Santiago to interpret the very existence of Israel as an exceptional phenomenon. In his analysis, the continuity of the Israeli state—born in the wake of the Holocausts’ devastation—is not solely the result of political or military dynamics, but of a deeper logic that combines history, identity, and strategic vision.
From International Resolution to State Consolidation
The starting point for this proposal is found in United Nations Resolution 181, passed in 1947, which paved the way for the creation of the State of Israel in 1948. Far from viewing it as an isolated event, Dr. José Benjamín Pérez Matos places it as the beginning of a sustained process of national reconstruction with global impact.
In that regard, he stated: “Israel’s survival cannot be analyzed solely in political terms; we are witnessing the greatest miracle of the modern era, both politically and spiritually,” emphasizing that the establishment of the State was not a circumstantial event, but rather the expression of a greater process.
The analysis acknowledges the historical upheavals of the Jewish people—including the loss of their territory in ancient times—but highlights that their return to the land in the 20th century represents a turning point that redefines their role in the contemporary international system.
Israel at the Center of the International System
For Dr. José Benjamín Pérez Matos, Israel’s current positioning is no coincidence. Its political, technological, and military influence, combined with its constant presence on the global agenda, make it an unavoidable actor in any analysis of regional and global stability.
Beyond the ongoing tensions in the Middle East, his argument suggests that Israel functions as a strategic node where geopolitical interests, ideological disputes, and power dynamics on a global scale.
In this context, the city of Jerusalem takes on unique significance, not only as a political and religious center, but also as a constant point of reference for the international community.
Strategic Expectations and Future Projections
One of the most significant aspects of this argument is the idea that Israel is currently undergoing a period of “strategic expectation,” in which, despite ongoing conflicts, a greater change is taking shape.
On this point, Dr. José Benjamín Pérez Matos affirmed: “Israel is at a moment of strategic expectation. Everything points to a decisive sign that will mark the beginning of a new stage in its history,” introducing the notion of a process that is still unfinished, but underway.
This interpretation takes the Israeli situation beyond the current situation, placing it within a dynamic of transformation that, according to his vision, will have global repercussions.
A Key Player in an Uncertain Scenario
In an international context characterized by volatile alliances, prolonged conflicts, and reconfigurations of power, Dr. José Benjamín Pérez Matos takes a clear stance: Israel cannot be regarded solely as a State in conflict, but rather as a structural player in the international order.
In his closing remarks, he synthesized this vision: “Israel is not merely a geopolitical actor; it is the axis of a Program that is about to fully manifest itself before the world,” consolidating a reading that combines political analysis with long-term projection.
Seventy-six years after its founding, the State of Israel continues to occupy a central place on the global agenda, not only because of its conflicts, but also because of its ability to influence—directly or indirectly—the shape of the international scene.
